If the Galaxy S22 dealt a blow to the appeal of the Galaxy S21 FE, the Galaxy A73 is here to finish the job. Take a look at the table below for a full breakdown of how the pricing of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G compares to the rest of the A-series and the Galaxy S21 FE and Galaxy S22 when it comes to pricing. The Galaxy A73 5G even comes equipped with the same amount of RAM (6GB) and storage (128GB) as the cheaper A53. Despite these similarities, there are a few big differences to take note of between the two budget-friendly handsets. The first, and most immediately noticeable, of these is the sheer size of the Galaxy A73 5G. At 6.7-inches, it’s bigger than both the Galaxy A53 and the Galaxy S21 FE. Thankfully, the thin bezels here offset some of the practical drawbacks of this more slate-like form factor. Larger handsets sometimes come across as overwhelming, but it feels like you just have more screen to work with here when it comes to everyday usage. Part of this is down to the pedigree of the screen involved. Display tech remains one of Samsung’s strongest qualities and the Galaxy A73 5G’s Super AMOLED screen feels a cut above most of what you’ll find in the mid-tier. So long as this isn’t the kind of large screen that becomes a burden for those with smaller hands, you can see more and do more with the hardware here. While both Samsung Super AMOLED displays (like the one found on the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G) and Dynamic AMOLED displays (like the one on the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE) are regarded as high quality when it comes to their brightness, resolution, and refresh rate, only the latter support HDR10+ content. For most consumers, this is going to be the main difference between the two technologies. Flagships like the Galaxy S22 support HDR. Mid-tier mavericks like the Galaxy A73 don’t. That said, the rear camera bump here is a bit more inconspicuous than what you’ll find with Samsung’s pricier products. Akin to something like OPPO’s Find X5 Series, the camera module on the Galaxy A73 5G is smoothly integrated into the chassis of the device. In any case, the back of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G incorporates a 108-megapixel primary camera sensor rounded out by a 12-megapixel ultra wide lens, a 5-megapixel macro lens, and a depth sensor of the same fidelity. While you don’t get the flexibility or Space Zoom functionality afforded by the telephoto lens found in Samsung’s top-of-the-line flagships, you do get a pretty decent bump to image quality for the $100 or so extra that the Galaxy A73 5G costs relative to the Galaxy A53. In practice, I found that pictures taken with the Galaxy A73 5G were surprisingly detailed when it came to well-lit subjects. If you’re looking to snap a social-ready pic in a pinch or squeeze in a little bit of food photography, the Galaxy A73 5G should be up to the task. Unfortunately, when it came to night photography, the device fell short in a way that’s unfortunately unsurprising given the brand and the price point involved. While the Galaxy A73 5G has a dedicated night mode setting, it is both slower and less reliable than what you’ll get out of a flagship handset like the Apple iPhone 13. Images were certainly more visible in this mode enabled than they were with it disabled, but even then, the Galaxy A73 5G’s camera often struggled to keep darker subjects in focus. While the Exynos chipsets of the past have provided pretty good performance, the fact that Samsung still pays the premium for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips rather than rely on their own in-house stock when it comes to higher-end devices like this one really tells you everything you need to know about which offers superior performance. Genshin Impact ran well for the most part, but frame rate drops were far from a rare occurrence. I could imagine clearing out my dailies on this thing, but longer sessions remain the domain of either my PC or my iPad. High fidelity shooters like Apex Legends Mobile and Fortnite were similarly hit and miss. In contrast, games with more modest graphical requirements like League of Legends: Wild Rift and Call of Duty: Mobile ran much better. If you’re someone who plays a lot of card games like Hearthstone or Legends of Runeterra, I imagine that the Galaxy A73 5G will be more than capable of allowing you to play on the go without compromising in any real respects. However, if your gaming needs are a little more demanding, then the more powerful silicon found in Samsung Galaxy S series or Apple’s latest iPhones might be a better choice. As someone who plays a fair amount of mobile games, I still found myself preferring to do so via a tablet, but jumping in for a quick session on the Galaxy A73 5G didn’t feel like it compromised the experience in the areas that matter the most. As for what that spec means for the real-world experience of relying on the device, I found that the Galaxy A73 5G delivered exceptional battery life. I’d regularly get between six and seven hours of screentime on a single charge and could usually go a full two days of regular usage before having to charge the device back up again. Burned down with streaming video, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G took 18 hours and 27 minutes to go from 100% to 0%.
title: “Samsung Galaxy A73 Review Mid Tier Maverick” ShowToc: true date: “2023-02-03” author: “Katrina Cecil”
Optus Mobile Review ALDI Mobile Review Amaysim Mobile Review Belong Mobile Review Circles.Life Review Vodafone Mobile Review Woolworths Mobile Review Felix Mobile Review Best iPhone Plans Best Family Mobile Plans Best Budget Smartphones Best Prepaid Plans Best SIM-Only Plans Best Plans For Kids And Teens Best Cheap Mobile Plans Telstra vs Optus Mobile Optus NBN Review Belong NBN Review Vodafone NBN Review Superloop NBN Review Aussie BB NBN Review iiNet NBN Review MyRepublic NBN Review TPG NBN Review Best NBN Satellite Plans Best NBN Alternatives Best NBN Providers Best Home Wireless Plans What is a Good NBN Speed? Test NBN Speed How to speed up your internet Optus vs Telstra Broadband ExpressVPN Review CyberGhost VPN Review NordVPN Review PureVPN Review Norton Secure VPN Review IPVanish VPN Review Windscribe VPN Review Hotspot Shield VPN Review Best cheap VPN services Best VPN for streaming Best VPNs for gaming What is a VPN? VPNs for ad-blocking If the Galaxy S22 dealt a blow to the appeal of the Galaxy S21 FE, the Galaxy A73 is here to finish the job. Take a look at the table below for a full breakdown of how the pricing of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G compares to the rest of the A-series and the Galaxy S21 FE and Galaxy S22 when it comes to pricing. The Galaxy A73 5G even comes equipped with the same amount of RAM (6GB) and storage (128GB) as the cheaper A53. Despite these similarities, there are a few big differences to take note of between the two budget-friendly handsets. The first, and most immediately noticeable, of these is the sheer size of the Galaxy A73 5G. At 6.7-inches, it’s bigger than both the Galaxy A53 and the Galaxy S21 FE. Thankfully, the thin bezels here offset some of the practical drawbacks of this more slate-like form-factor. Larger handsets sometimes come across as overwhelming, but it feels like you just have more screen to work with here when it comes to everyday usage. Part of this is down to the pedigree of the screen involved. Display tech remains one of Samsung’s strongest qualities and the Galaxy A73 5G’s Super AMOLED screen feels a cut above most of what you’ll find in the mid-tier. So long as this isn’t the kind of large-screen that becomes a burden for those with smaller hands, you can see more and do more with the hardware here. While both Samsung Super AMOLED displays (like the one found on the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G) and Dynamic AMOLED displays (like the one on the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE) are regarded as high quality when it comes to their brightness, resolution and refresh rate, only the latter support HDR10+ content. For most consumers, this is going to be the main difference between the two technologies. Flagships like the Galaxy S22 support HDR. Mid-tier mavericks like the Galaxy A73 don’t. That said, the rear camera bump here is a bit more inconspicuous than what you’ll find with Samsung’s pricier products. Akin to something like OPPO’s Find X5 Series, the camera module on the Galaxy A73 5G is smoothly integrated into the chassis of the device. In any case, the back of the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G incorporates a 108-megapixel primary camera sensor rounded out by a 12-megapixel ultra wide lens, a 5-megapixel macro lens and a depth sensor of the same fidelity. While you don’t get the flexibility or Space Zoom functionality afforded by the telephoto lens found in Samsung’s top-of-the-line flagships, you do get a pretty decent bump to image quality for the $100 or so extra that the Galaxy A73 5G costs relative to the Galaxy A53. In practice, I found that pictures taken with the Galaxy A73 5G were surprisingly detailed when it came to well-lit subjects.If you’re looking to snap a social-ready pic in a pinch or squeeze in a little bit of food photography, the Galaxy A73 5G should be up to the task. Unfortunately, when it came to night photography, the device fell short in a way that’s unfortunately unsurprising given the brand the price-point involved. While the Galaxy A73 5G has a dedicated night mode setting, it is both slower and less reliable than what you’ll get out of a flagship handset like the Apple iPhone 13. Images were certainly more visible in this mode enabled than they were with it disabled, but even then the Galaxy A73 5G’s camera often struggled to keep darker subjects in focus. While the Exynos chipsets of the past have provided pretty good performance, the fact that Samsung still pays the premium for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips rather than rely on their own in-house stock when it comes to higher-end devices like this one really tells you everything you need to know about which offers superior performance. Genshin Impact ran well for the most part, but frame rate drops were far from a rare occurrence. I could imagine clearing out my dailies on this thing, but longer sessions remain the domain of either my PC or my iPad. High fidelity shooters like Apex Legends Mobile and Fortnite were similarly hit and miss. In contrast, games with more modest graphical requirements like League of Legends: Wild Rift and Call of Duty: Mobile ran much better. If you’re someone who plays a lot of card games like Hearthstone or Legends of Runeterra, I imagine that the Galaxy A73 5G will be more than capable of allowing you to play on the go without compromising in any real respects. However, if your gaming needs are a little more demanding, then the more powerful silicon found in Samsung Galaxy S series or Apple’s latest iPhones might be a better choice. As someone who plays a fair amount of mobile games, I still found myself preferring to do so via a tablet, but jumping in for a quick session on the Galaxy A73 5G didn’t feel like it compromised the experience in the areas that matter the most. As for what that spec means for the real-world experience of relying on the device, I found that the Galaxy A73 5G delivered exceptional battery life. I’d regularly get between six and seven hours of screentime on a single charge and could usually go a full two days of regular usage before having to charge the device back up again. Burned down with streaming video, the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G took 18 hours and 27 minutes to go from 100% to 0%.
