First, of course, we need to take a look at yesterday’s results:

The Taurus wins it, and that’s no bull. It’s just more car than the little Topaz. Neither one is a terrible choice, but the Taurus will give you quite a bit more for your money. Love ’em or hate ’em, crossovers are here to stay. They already make up a huge chunk of the automotive landscape, and they’re trickling down to the cheap end of the used car market in large numbers. Are they worth checking out if you just need cheap wheels? Let’s look at a pair of them and see.

2002 Lexus RX300 – $3,000

Engine/drivetrain: 3.0 liter overhead-cam V6, four speed automatic, AWD Location: Lawrenceville, GA Odometer reading: 231,000 miles Runs/drives? Yep The Lexus RX300 was one of the earliest luxury crossovers, and it quickly became a fixture of the suburban landscape. And I swear ninety percent of them are this color. You’ll be forgiven if you never noticed that there are a dozen of them in every HomeGoods parking lot, even to this day. It was successful because it works: it’s a comfortable, luxurious vehicle that rides like a car, but sits high like an SUV. For the soccer-mom set, who loved the commanding view over the hoods of their Cherokees and Blazers but hated the trucklike ride, it was a revelation.

I’ll say this for all of these twenty-year-old RX300s: they’re aging well. Lexus vehicles in general don’t seem to show their age; it’s as if there’s a picture of the car somewhere getting old and rusty and dented while the real thing stays looking new. (Maybe that’s why so many of them are painted Gray.) This one is no exception: At well over 200,000 miles, it looks a little tired around the edges, and that’s it.

We aren’t given a whole lot of information about this Lexus’s condition, other than an assurance that it has never been in an accident. But it does look clean and well-kept, and as it’s a Toyota under all the leather and power toys, it should be holding up well mechanically. The RX300 is powered by a three-liter V6, and this one is all-wheel-drive. The only available transmission is an automatic, of course.

And yeah, I know, this is not the sort of vehicle that us enthusiasts are drawn to. But it is practical, reliable, and nice, and for most people who don’t know what an apex is and have never taken something apart on a car for fun, there is a lot of appeal in that.

2005 Mazda Tribute – $2,950

Engine/drivetrain: 2.3 liter dual overhead cam inline 4, four-speed automatic, FWD Location: Lake Butler, FL Odometer reading: 239,000 miles Runs/drives? You bet This is, of course, not the best SUV in the world. This is just… well, you know. The Mazda Tribute is the sister model to Ford’s Escape; it’s a handsome little unibody SUV meant for making Costco runs rather than blazing trails off-road. This one especially is confined to the pavement – it’s only front wheel drive. Tributes and Escapes were available with four or six cylinder engines; this one has Mazda’s well-regarded 2.3 liter MZR twincam four. You could get a Tribute with a stick, but sadly this one only has two pedals.

This Tribute has a bunch of miles on it, but it looks well cared-for. And despite the bargain-basement powertrain, it’s well-equipped otherwise, and everything still works. This seller has several other listings, including another Escape, which makes me think they’re one of those dealers masquerading as a private seller. It doesn’t matter much, but don’t expect to get any history or service records. Be prepared to check it out carefully on your own.

Tributes and Escapes were available in some fun colors, which makes it kind of a shame that this one is refrigerator-white. But beggars can’t be choosers at the bottom end of the used car market; you take the car in the color you can find. At least it has the gray plastic cladding to break up all the white, and it looks clean and straight.

Really, with the four cylinder and the automatic, and only the front wheels driven, this Tribute is hardly an SUV at all. What we have here is a small, tall station wagon. And there’s nothing wrong with that – small wagons are supremely practical vehicles. And there’s nothing wrong with wanting to sit up high so you can see clearly. Again, these things are popular because they work. Every other vehicle on the road is a crossover these days, so there will be more and more of them for sale  cheap in years to come. But for now, these are what you’ve got to choose from. Which one is worth the money?

(Image credits: Craigslist sellers)   This model Lexus has no such weaknesses. Plus all the points about the Mazda interior being a much less classy model in merely OK shape, and the Lexus looking like a solid lux car with little wear inside, and a lot of miles left in it. The 04 died when the parking brake failed (or my mother failed to set it) and it rolled off the cliff on the edge of their driveway. It already had one deer strike under it’s belt. 196k, RIP. The 08 was the victim of a snowstorm interstate pile-up at 203k. RIP. The 2011 is still trucking along at 405k with a clutch and a junkyard motor. It’s been through 3 deer strikes, the last one of which was a total purchased back and reassembled with “close enough” colored JY parts. 257k on the motor. At this point it’s a game to see how long they can limp that chariot down the road, my dad commutes 130 miles a day with it. Currently diagnosing a bad miss but it’s getting it done. The 2009 was my mother’s daily, bought used, and only had 109k on it when it was rear-ended and totalled. RIP, you were far too young. My brother’s rocking a 2010 with a bunch of zip ties holding it together at 220k. The escape died last week in another rear-ending at 260k, all original. RIP. They drive a little sportier than escapes in both generations, but the first gen was better than the second. The second had some nice, albeit bland, styling going for it though, and holy crap can you pack some shit into that big two-box design. Luxurious? No. Powerful? No. But damn they were fine cheap useful automobiles, and pretty nails tough for what they were. Hard to find a better compromise between “drives like a shitty car” and “I can treat it like a shitty truck.” And for that they’ll always have a spot in my heart. Just for that, and the nicer interior, Lexus all the way. I can’t even say that I hated it; it was just a new paradigm. I feel that with this one vehicle, Lexus set a path that the entire industry followed.

Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 11Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 83Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 23Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 41Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 78Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 19Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 83Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 24Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 52Southern Fried Crossovers  2002 Lexus RX300 vs 2005 Mazda Tribute - 69